- The Crypto Fire
- Posts
- 🚫 ETH CEO Said NOO!
🚫 ETH CEO Said NOO!
$6.8K Became $1.5M with No Hype

While most people were busy watching James Wynn, a low-key wallet quietly printed real profit from thin air (and billions in volume). They didn’t even bet on market direction. They used a boring strategy… that beat the game!
Here’s what we got for you today:

⭐ 5 Things You Shouldn’t Miss
📱 Pump.fun dropped its long-awaited 2.0 mobile app packed with Movers Feed for real-time trending tokens + ‘Tap-to-Ape’ for one-tap token buying + Built-in news tab to track headlines and hype. But $PUMP.X ( ▼ 1.18% ) token isn’t moving. At all. It looks more like a ghost token right now.
Pump Fun 2.0 is HERE
the easiest way to DOMINATE the trenches, with
- the movers feed
- tap-to-ape for the FASTEST execution across ANY mobile app
- the news section, showing you the top trending coins in the ecosystemand much more!
download the app NOW on iOS & Android 👇🏻
— pump.fun (@pumpdotfun)
2:43 PM • Jun 27, 2025
🔥 After Trump called Canada’s new tax on US Big Tech a “blatant attack” and threatened tariffs within 7 days, he cut off all trade talks on Truth Social. But then, Canada officially cancelled the digital services tax and are now rushing to reach a trade deal, just ahead of the G7 summit. Market reaction: Green shoots return.
Trump abruptly ends trade talks with Canada over digital services tax: ‘Direct and blatant attack on our Country’ trib.al/KOwQiCr
— New York Post (@nypost)
6:31 PM • Jun 27, 2025
🚀 Metaplanet just added 1,005 BTC (worth $108M) to its holdings, pushing its total to 13,350 BTC. It’s now officially ahead of Galaxy Digital and CleanSpark, and sitting at #5 globally. Yes, just 3 months ago, they only had 3,350 BTC. Its stock ($MTPLF ( ▲ 0.1% ) ) jumped 9% in the first hours of trading today.
Metaplanet has acquired 1,005 BTC for ~$108.1 million at ~$107,601 per bitcoin and has achieved BTC Yield of 348.8% YTD 2025. As of 6/30/2025, we hold 13,350 $BTC acquired for ~$1.31 billion at ~$97,832 per bitcoin. $MTPLF
— Simon Gerovich (@gerovich)
3:00 AM • Jun 30, 2025
👀 James Wynn is back… He just opened a massive short on $BTC.X ( ▼ 0.6% ) with 40x leverage, same high-risk style as always. One small move up and boom, liquidated. But if BTC dips even a little… it could be a fat payday. You already know how James plays. All or nothing. Watch his wallet.
I’m gonna go short so bitcoin can pump yeah, this will work right? Right?
Send $BTC 🚀🚀🚀— Jwynn.eth (@JamesWynnReal)
1:58 AM • Jun 29, 2025
😂 Arthur Hayes praised EtherFi like he’s their biggest fan… then cashed out over $1M. His alt wallet sent 2.46M $ETHFI.X ( ▲ 4.04% ) (~$2.21M) to Binance. He bought this batch back in April with only $1.19M. Back in Dec, he hyped up Ethena… then unstaked and dumped $8.48M in $ENA.X ( ▲ 0.58% ) on Binance, too. When Arthur starts tweeting love, check the wallets!
. @CryptoHayes 这 "前脚奶,后脚卖" 的招式屡用不爽啊😂:
他在过去 5 小时里将 246.8 万枚 $ETHFI ($2.21M) 枚进币安跟 Galaxy Digital (也进入了币安),获利 $102 万。
而他最新的推文还是前天转发的项目方 @ether_fi 的推文奶了一口 (我引用的这条)😂奶完就卖是他的惯用伎俩了,去年 12
— 余烬 (@EmberCN)
11:27 AM • Jun 28, 2025
⚠️ Ethereum’s Co-founder Warns: Worldcoin is Killing Your Online Anonymity
Ethereum’s co-founder, Vitalik Buterin, just raised a serious red flag about digital identity platforms and especially Worldcoin ($WLD.X ( ▲ 0.63% ) ), which quietly rebranded to “World” in October 2024.
Even if the tech sounds cool or futuristic, we need to think carefully about who runs it, and what it could become.
😳 Is Online Anonymity Dying? Vitalik Thinks So
He just dropped a serious warning about the future of digital identity and it’s aimed straight at Worldcoin (now renamed “World”).
Does digital ID have risks even if it's ZK-wrapped?
vitalik.eth.limo/general/2025/0…
— vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin)
9:35 AM • Jun 28, 2025
Vitalik’s concern: Worldcoin is building a system where “every person has one ID.” Sounds organized, right? But here’s the problem → It kills anonymity, which has always been a core value of both the internet and crypto culture.
If this kind of ID system becomes the default, we’re heading into a world of mass biometric surveillance, where everything you do online is tied back to a single, public identity.
Even though Worldcoin says they use Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP) to protect privacy, Vitalik says that’s not enough.
Who can build with World ID? Anyone 🫡 It's an open protocol with privacy protections like ZKPs built in so that no actions taken with World ID are linked to a person's iris images or iris code & there's no linkage between different actions taken with World ID.
— World (@worldcoin)
9:00 PM • Aug 15, 2023
→ Because once your actions are always linked to one public ID, privacy becomes optional and eventually, impossible.
What’s at stake:
Losing the ability to be anonymous
Losing the freedom to have multiple digital identities
And giving up control over how and when we reveal who we are
⚠️ Real Risk: A Single ID Could Be a Single Point of Control
Vitalik’s also painting a very real picture of what could happen if “one person = one ID” becomes the norm:
Political Surveillance
If all your online activity is tied to one identity, governments or powerful groups could track you with ease. No more private browsing, no more pseudonyms — just a full-time digital record of who you are and what you do.AI-Powered Tracking
With advanced AI behavior tracking, real-time data analysis could get scary fast. Your habits, searches, transactions — all logged and analyzed, possibly without your consent.Forced Disclosure
If there's only one ID, employers or apps could pressure you to link all your accounts or expose your full digital history. That means no separating personal, work, and anonymous identities.
And yes, even if systems use fancy tech like Zero-Knowledge Proofs to "protect" your privacy, Vitalik says the core risk remains.
Privacy shouldn’t depend on trust in platforms. It should be a built-in right, not a feature you have to hope survives.
🛠️ Vitalik’s Solution: Identity Without Losing Privacy
In fact, he’s spent years working on ways to verify who you are without giving up your freedom or privacy.
But he rejects the idea that a one-size-fits-all model like Worldcoin is the only way to fight spam or fake users (like Sybil attacks).
Instead, Vitalik suggests a diverse identity system, one where you choose how to verify yourself, based on the situation.
.@VitalikButerin just published a deep blog on ZK + digital ID.
vitalik.eth.limo/general/2025/0…Main points:
Even with zero-knowledge proofs, identity systems can backfire.💥 Privacy lost
💥 Pseudonymity gone
💥 Coercion risk highThe solution? Pluralistic Identity
Here’s how— KILT Protocol ✈️ @EthCC🇫🇷🏖️ (@Kiltprotocol)
12:10 AM • Jun 29, 2025
Examples of what you could use:
Your social graph (friends or network)
A passport or email
Biometric data (if you want to)
Your crypto wallet
Or any other “proof-of-personhood” method
You decide what to reveal, when, and in what context, not some company forcing you to tie your entire life to one ID.
Vitalik believes no single platform should dominate the identity game. Choice, flexibility, and privacy should always come first.
👁️ Worldcoin Goes Global While Privacy Fears Grow
Right when Vitalik warned about the dangers of biometric identity, Worldcoin is doubling down, expanding faster than ever.
Here’s what’s happening 👇
a. Mass rollout in the US
Worldcoin just launched in 6 major cities: SF, LA, Miami, Atlanta, Nashville, and Austin.
They raised another $135M and plan to bring iris-scanning “Orbs” to 180 million Americans. Yeah, 180M.
b. World Card is coming
They're testing a Visa card that will let users spend $WLD.X ( ▲ 0.63% ) like cash. Launch expected by end of year.
Personal finance 🤝 Rewards for verified humans.
The World Card will let verified humans spend straight from World App and access rewards. Online, IRL, anywhere @Visa is accepted.
— World (@worldcoin)
2:46 AM • May 1, 2025
It’s also integrated with big names like Stripe, Circle, and Kalshi → a real push into mainstream finance.
c. Now on... Tinder Japan
Worldcoin teamed up with Tinder Japan to verify that users are real humans. This is the first major dating app to use biometric ID nationwide. Starts in Japan, but who knows where next.
d. Gamified identity: “League of Humans”
Partnering with Razer, they’re launching a gamer-focused campaign blending real human ID and online competitions. World ID could soon be tied to how you log in to your favorite game.
e. Orb Mini for the Global South → To scale in developing countries, they launched Orb Mini - a small, low-cost iris scanner. The goal? Reach hundreds of millions of people with no current digital ID.
Meanwhile, the token isn’t keeping up. Despite the expansion, WLD is struggling, trading at $0.92, and still under key resistance.
😳 How Hyperliquid Trader Turns From $6.8K to $1.5M. No Directional Bets
Someone just pulled off a massive win on Hyperliquid, and they did it quietly. Using wallet 0x6f90…336a, this trader turned just $6,800 (funded in early Feb 2024) into over $1.5 million.
No chasing pumps. No risky long/short plays. No wild leverage games.
What’s wild is they didn’t even bet on market direction, they likely used smart, neutral strategies. Real profits 👇
1️⃣ Andrew Tate vs James Wynn: When Crypto Leverage Goes Very Wrong
If you’ve ever thought of going all-in on crypto leverage, this might change your mind.
In just a few days, Andrew Tate and James Wynn both became cautionary tales of what not to do on Hyperliquid, a popular decentralized trading platform.
Andrew Tate just lost $583,000 on a leveraged ETH trade. He placed 76 trades, won only 27, and blew up the rest with 25x leverage. His wallet now? Allegedly down to just $4.
The worst part? He flexed a 138.5% gain on X (Twitter) to promote his referral code. But blockchain sleuths immediately exposed the truth: the 138% win was fake, and he was deep in the red.
Andrew Tate(@Cobratate) doesn’t seem to be good at perps trading.
He has made 76 trades on Hyperliquid, with only 27 wins — a 35.53% win rate and a total loss of $583K.
He's currently long $ETH with 25x leverage.
hyperdash.info/trader/0xB78D9…
— Lookonchain (@lookonchain)
6:16 AM • Jun 12, 2025
On the flip side, James Wynn lost $87 million in a brutal liquidation streak. He once had it all. But his famous $100M long on BTC and a 10x $PEPE.X ( ▲ 2.82% ) trade went sideways. One bad move erased millions.
This isn’t just about bad trading. It’s a DeFi lesson:
On-chain data doesn’t lie.
Over-leveraging (10x+) increases your liquidation risk by 40%.
And on DEXs like Hyperliquid, there’s no safety net. Just smart contracts and raw volatility.
Things got so bad that Hyperliquid had to reduce leverage limits:
BTC: from 50x → 40x
ETH: from 33x → 25x
2️⃣ While James Wynn Lost $100M… This Trader Quietly Printed Millions
While the spotlight was on James, someone else was quietly winning big.
→ Wallet 0x6f90…336a has done over $20.6 billion in trading volume in just a few months. But here’s the twist: they weren’t chasing price 👇
Unlock Full Market Insights in This Part with Pro Plan
You’re reading a premium insight. Stay ahead of the crypto curve. Go beyond the headlines with full access to premium insights, in-depth analysis, and actionable investment narratives. FREE for 14 days – no commitment, cancel anytime.
🤡 Meme Of The Day

We read your emails, comments, and poll replies daily
Rate us today!Your feedback helps us improve and deliver better content! |
Hit reply and say Hello – we'd love to hear from you!
Like what you're reading?
If yes, you'll love what’s happening inside The Crypto Fire Telegram version - our Telegram group where is no hype, no pressure. Just real conversations, insights, latest news, more trading analysis, entry,... and a few memes along the way. Jump in here → t.me/TheCryptoFireTG
And if you’ve got a friend deep in crypto (or just getting started), feel free to forward this to them. They can sign up here.
Cheers,
The Crypto Fire
This newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Traders should conduct thorough research, understand the risks, and carefully evaluate their decisions before investing in cryptocurrency.
Reply